Will it be someone you know, anybody the sender try dating, or unknown people?

Although we realize some in regards to the frequency and correlates of adolescent sexting, analysis delivering detailed understanding of social contexts of the conduct is actually its infancy. A lot of the prevailing analysis on sexting have tended to consider what is happening instead of precisely why, creating a necessity for grant geared towards developing principle. Certainly, Chalfen ( 2010 ) debated any particular one important potential way for research on teenage sexting had been qualitative services that could render understanding of teens’ motives for sexting. Today’s research takes one step contained in this path with a qualitative review in the personal contexts of teenage sexting in the USA. The goal would be to enhance the existing US-based quantitative facts on teenage sexting, and use these knowledge to see the generation of hypotheses to steer potential analysis in this area. Attracting from design from inside the study talked about above, we registered this task with three analysis concerns.

With RQ1, we needed to comprehend the sorts of connections in which adolescents might submit, obtain, or change sexts, and earn insight into the reasons that notify sexting on these relational contexts. RQ2 was aimed towards understanding the level that adolescents see sexting as appropriate, as well as uncovering certain rationales informing these viewpoints. At long last, RQ3 reflected our interest in examining possible sex and years variations in the relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting.


Data with this research entailed responses to open-ended authored surveys that were given during focus groups in three different US urban centers included in the a€?Teens and Smartphone Phonesa€? job because of the Pew Web and American Life Foundation plus the University of Michigan (Lenhart, Ling, Campbell, & Purcell, 2010 ). Throughout the focus communities, participants had been requested to spend 20a€“30 moments privately, confidentially, and anonymously providing authored responses to numerous unrestricted questions about sexting, and also other information that were not the main present study. This approach is consumed purchase to mitigate the risk of any pains that ongst more adolescents, in order to earn affirmation from Pew’s study spouse university’s organization Assessment panel.


Members happened to be strategically employed by a 3rd party company to make sure an acceptable stability old, gender, battle, socioeconomic updates, and population density. Fifty-one adolescents took part in these focus organizations and as a consequence finished the survey. Members ranged in years from 12 to 18 years (M = , SD = 1.83), with a good balance of centuries from this selection (32 %, 12a€“13 decades; 37 percentage, 14a€“15 many years; 32 percentage, 16a€“18 years). All forms comprise complete between ple offers a level gender ratio with twenty-six males and twenty-five females. Twenty-two individuals were from metropolitan Atlanta, fourteen comprise from metropolitan Denver, and fifteen happened to be from metropolitan New York City.


Q: perhaps you have delivered or was given a picture or video on the mobile that requires nudity, furthermore occasionally known as snapsext a€?sextinga€?? Clarify how frequently this occurs and exactly who sends these types of imagery (without supplying names).

Q: Ever delivered these types of photos or video clip together with your cellphone? If yes, the thing that was the specific situation?

As mentioned previous, these issues are part of a larger nationwide Pew study (Lenhart et al., 2010 ). In that feel, the present study is another investigations of existing facts. Even though the issues are not particularly crafted for this paper, they give chances to deal with our center analysis questions. 1

Kinds and themes are analyzed using components of Hammersley and Atkinson’s ( 1995 ) framework for analyzing qualitative information. 1st, both authors thoroughly study and re-read every transcripts to be acquainted with them. After checking out the transcripts, servings on the responses had been reassembled and grouped relating to two broad designs reflecting aspects of RQ1 and RQ2 defined above. Subsequently each routine got evaluated and processed into stronger selections of consistencies. By using these thematic classes positioned, the initial author looked-for anecdotes and quotations that most readily useful illustrate them. Eventually, a validity check got executed because of the 2nd author, whom examined the findings and granted a final rounded of fine-tuning.